ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Misdiagnosis and fatal outcome of advanced cervical adenosquamous carcinoma in pregnancy: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe special physiological changes during pregnancy pose a huge challenge to the diagnosis of cervical cancer in pregnancy (CCIP). However, due to the poor prognosis of advanced-stage CCIP, there is currently no consensus or guideline for diagnosis and treatment. CASE SUMMARY: In this case report, we presented the case of a 30-year-old woman at 30 weeks of gestation who presented with irregular vaginal bleeding and was admitted to a local hospital at 35 weeks of gestation with a sudden gush of fluid and underwent a C-section. During the surgery, a rotten fish-like solid mass in the lower segment of the posterior wall of the uterus was excised for biopsy. The patient was referred to our hospital because she experienced heavy vaginal bleeding 13 days after one chemotherapy session. The solid mass was initially misdiagnosed as uterine clear-cell carcinoma at local hospital but later confirmed as cervical adenosquamous carcinoma by a multidisciplinary team. Three months posttreatment, she succumbed to multiple tumor metastases. The infant was healthy at the latest 2-year follow-up.
conclusionObstetricians should expand differential diagnoses when obstetric factors cannot explain symptoms of persistent vaginal bleeding during pregnancy. Atypical and insidious clinical presentations are often concealed by physiological changes during pregnancy, which may increase the difficulty of diagnosis and result in misdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.