ArticleCirculation reports2025
Placement of the Coronary Sinus Catheter via the Right Cubital Vein During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Filtering Function to Reduce Radiation Exposure During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.Circulation reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electrode catheter placement into the coronary sinus (CS) is critical for electrophysiologic studies. Although central venous approaches (e.g., internal jugular or subclavian) are well documented, peripheral venous approaches like the cubital vein are not. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of CS catheter placement via the right cubital vein during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods and Results: Of 1,363 consecutive patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at Sakurabashi Watanabe Advanced Healthcare Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021, 1,274 underwent at least 1 right cubital vein puncture attempt. The success rate, causes of failure, and complications were analyzed. CS catheters were successfully placed via the right cubital vein in 1,214 (95.3%) patients, whereas placements were unsuccessful in 60 (4.7%) patients. Although older patients were more likely to experience unsuccessful placements, there were no significant differences in other baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. Unsuccessful placements were attributed to failure in venipuncture or sheath insertion (n=49) and failure to advance the CS catheter through the vein (n=11). No major complications were reported. Conclusions: CS catheter placement via the right cubital vein demonstrated high feasibility and safety, with a 95% success rate and minimal complications. This approach offers a practical and technically straightforward alternative for placing CS catheters, particularly in patients with adequate vein development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.