ArticleCirculation reports2025
Nationwide Analysis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection-Related Acute Myocardial Infarction in Japanese Patients Aged ≤60 Years Using the Administrative JROAD-DPC Database.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) causes acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Clinical characteristics of SCAD patients remain insufficiently understood. Methods and Results: We analyzed AMI patients aged ≤60 years using the nationwide Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (2012.04.01-2022.03.31). SCAD was defined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision code I24.8 and the presence of keyword 'coronary artery dissection'. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Among 96,304 eligible patients, 330 (0.34%) had SCAD. SCAD patients were younger (P<0.001), more often female (P<0.001), and had fewer atherogenic risk factors. They less frequently received aspirin (P<0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (P<0.001), statins (P<0.001), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; P<0.001). After propensity score matching, in-hospital all-cause mortality did not differ between SCAD and non-SCAD patients (1.0% vs. 2.9%; P=0.142). The subgroup analysis revealed that the use of aspirin was associated with a lower adjusted in-hospital all-cause mortality (P=0.002), whereas primary PCI (P=0.223), β-blocker (P=0.646), and statin (P=0.608) were not. Of note, older SCAD patients were more likely to exhibit inferior MI (P=0.036 for trend) with shorter duration of hospitalization (P=0.025 for trend). Conclusions: Short-term outcomes in SCAD patients are comparable with those of atherosclerotic AMI. While aspirin lowered in-hospital mortality, PCI, β-blocker, and statin did not. Our findings suggest the need for physicians to select appropriate therapeutic management in SCAD patients to achieve better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.