ArticleCirculation reports2025
Predictors of Sinus Rhythm Maintenance After Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Significant Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) results from left atrial enlargement and dysfunction, typically observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Predictors of sinus rhythm maintenance after catheter ablation in atrial FMR patients are not well understood. Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed 1,410 consecutive patients who underwent initial catheter ablation for AF at Kobe University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2022. Of these patients, 56 (4%; mean [±SD] age 68±8 years; 68% male) had significant (moderate, n=48; severe, n=8) atrial FMR based on pre-ablation transesophageal echocardiography. At follow-up echocardiography, a reduction in the left atrial diameter (LAd) was observed in 30 patients, whereas improvement in mitral regurgitation (MR) was noted in 26. During a mean follow-up period of 835 days, AF recurred in 23 (41%) patients. Kaplan-Meier curves for AF recurrence did not differ based on LAd reductions or MR improvements alone. However, recurrence rates were significantly lower in patients who achieved both LAd reduction and MR improvement than in those who did not achieve both changes (P=0.0259). Multivariate analysis revealed that the combination of LAd reduction and MR improvement was the only significant predictor of a decrease in AF recurrence (hazard ratio 0.275; 95% confidence interval 0.091-0.826; P=0.021). Conclusions: In AF patients with significant atrial FMR, achieving both LAd reduction and MR improvement after ablation is important to reduce the risk of AF recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.