Trial reportWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of exosomes from Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells in traumatic brain injury.
Trial report in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cells in Post-Stroke Regenerative Therapy: Current Role of Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Orchestrum.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Exosome-enabled bone defect repair: mechanistic foundations, bioengineered delivery, and artificial intelligence-driven translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel drug delivery carrier: engineering strategies and clinical safety estimation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Exosome-Based Diagnostics and Cell-Free Therapeutics for Traumatic Brain Injury: From Mechanisms to Bedside.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue, leading to long-term neurological impairments. Current treatments offer limited recovery, particularly in restoring lost functions. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (MSCdE) have shown potential for promoting neuroprotection and regeneration. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of MSCdE therapy in TBI patients.
aimTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of MSCdE therapy in TBI patients.
methodsFive patients (mean age 27.00 ± 4.06 years) with TBI from combat injuries were treated with six rounds of MSCdE therapy (3 mL intrathecally and 3 mL intramuscularly per round). The patients were followed for one year. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0), and functional outcomes were evaluated with the functional independence measure (FIM), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS).
resultsNo serious adverse events occurred, and only mild side effects [subfebrile fever (37.5 °C-37.9 °C), pain] were reported (CTCAE Grade 1). FIM motor scores improved significantly (46.20 ± 16.39 to 64.20 ± 18.20,
conclusionMSCdE therapy is safe and effective in improving motor function, cognition, and quality of life in TBI patients. Larger, controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings and optimize MSCdE therapy for TBI treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.