ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
In-hospital
Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors, barriers and facilitators of bystander interventions in out of hospital cardiac arrest: a cross-sectional study from the UAE.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest is a critical condition characterized by abrupt cessation of cardiac function, resulting in reduced oxygen delivery to vital organs and rapid progression to death if not timely treated. Despite advances in medical science and resuscitation techniques, cardiac arrest remains a significant burden globally, with survival rates remaining low. Comprehensive research on cardiac arrest, particularly comparisons between in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), is limited.
aimTo compare the survival rates, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to discharge, and neurological outcomes after IHCA and OHCA in Arab Asian countries.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar (2000-2024) using keywords ("IHCA", "OHCA", "cardiac arrest", "Middle East", "Arab", "Asian") in titles/abstracts. The inclusion criterion was observational studies on adults (≥ 18 years) in Arab Asian countries reporting relevant outcomes. The exclusion criteria were narrative reviews, non-Arab Asian studies, non-English publications, inaccessible full texts, pediatric-only populations, and studies lacking outcome data.
resultsIn total, 44 observational studies from nine Arab Asian countries comprising 32535 participants were included. This review highlights the substantial variability in cardiac arrest outcomes in Asian countries. OHCA mortality rates were alarmingly high in several nations, with Kuwait (99%), Bahrain (98.8%), and Qatar (97.6%) reporting the highest figures. In contrast, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) had a markedly lower OHCA mortality rate (8.2%). The rates of ROSC also varied, with Qatar achieving the highest (34.4%) and Kuwait the lowest (3.3%). Survival to hospital discharge ranged from 1.2% in Bahrain to 18.7% in Kuwait, with Qatar also reporting favorable rates (17.5%). For IHCA, mortality was 73.6% in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and 72.8% in KSA, whereas Lebanon and Iraq reported higher rates of 94.6% and 88%, respectively. ROSC rates were the highest in Lebanon (55.9%) and the UAE (51.3%). Neurological outcome reporting has been inconsistent, although Qatar reported a high rate (68.6%) for OHCA survivors. Comparative data showed generally better survival and neurological outcomes with IHCA than with OHCA.
conclusionThis systematic review underscores the clear disparity in survival outcomes between IHCA and OHCA in Arab Asian countries, with IHCA demonstrating superior outcomes. Despite progress in some countries, outcomes remain suboptimal compared with international standards. Future multicenter studies with standardized methodologies are required to generate high-quality evidence and provide region-specific interventions for cardiac arrest management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.