Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377529›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2025

Giving urine biochemistry a second chance in acute kidney injury monitoring.

Alexandre Toledo Maciel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandre Toledo MacielDepartment of Research, Imed Group, Hospital São Camilo Pompéia Adult ICU, São Paulo 05022-001, Brazil. alexandre.toledo@imedgroup.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies assessing urine biochemistry for acute kidney injury (AKI) monitoring rely on paradigms from the 1970s. It was proposed that a single measurement of urinary parameters in the presence of increased serum creatinine (sCr) could help understand AKI pathophysiology and predict its duration. However, those studies produced variable and controversial results. Recently, an alternative "urine biochemical approach" has been proposed. In contrast with the traditional approach, it includes sequential urine electrolyte assessment, evaluation before AKI diagnosis, and interpretation of avid sodium retention as a marker of renal microcirculatory stress instead of low renal perfusion. This review highlights the rationale of this alternative approach, which is focused on early urinary biochemical changes that precede increases in sCr as well as signs of renal recovery before decreases in sCr. The relevance of urine composition in conjunction with urine volume for a proper evaluation of renal function is emphasized. This new approach aims to enhance the utility of urinary biochemical parameters in AKI monitoring, particularly in patients who are critically ill.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryExcreted mass of creatinineFractional excretion of potassiumMonitoringUrinary potassium/urinary creatinine concentration ratioUrinary sodium concentrationUrine biochemical approachUrine biochemistryUrine electrolytes

Identifiers

PMID41377529
PMCPMC12687057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.