ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Critical care primary services are associated with reduced midazolam use in the intensive care unit.
Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Impact of the intensivist at the bedside - the case of rational use of benzodiazepines.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnalgesia and sedation are commonly prescribed therapies within the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Current guidelines recommend utilizing an analgesia-first approach to initially reach appropriate pain control, while potentially achieving sedation goals concurrently. Our system employs a guideline-based ICU sedation order-set that features an electronic medical record (EMR) integrated ICU checklist that combines analgesia and sedation.
aimTo identify systems-based factors that are associated with the use of continuous midazolam infusion administration in mechanically ventilated patients.
methodsWe extracted EMR data from patients who received mechanical ventilation between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Subjects included were 18 years or older who received mechanical ventilation. "R" version 4.3.2 was used for data processing and statistical analysis. We performed a multivariable regression analysis to predict the administration of a continuous midazolam infusion with modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Charlson comorbidity index, and critical care medicine (CCM) primary service.
resultsOf 3805 patients that underwent mechanical ventilation, 62% were male, with a mean age of 66.9 years. 3429 patients were treated by a provider team with a CCM attending, and 376 patients were managed by a non-CCM primary team with CCM consultative services. A midazolam infusion was used in 187 of 3429 (5%) patients with CCM as primary and in 166 of 376 (56%) patients with non-CCM primary (
conclusionContinuous midazolam infusion was more likely in patients admitted to the ICU under an open unit with a non-CCM physician with an intensivist consult available, despite guided order-sets and checklists integrated into the EMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.