Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377525›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2025

Critical care primary services are associated with reduced midazolam use in the intensive care unit.

Konstantin G Nestoiter, Kristin Feick, Kristen Looney, Matthew Zaccheo, Yijin Wert, Christopher Franz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Konstantin G NestoiterDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States. konstantin.nestoiter@gmail.com.
Kristin FeickDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States.
Kristen LooneyDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States.
Matthew ZaccheoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States.
Yijin WertDepartment of Research and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States.
Christopher FranzDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalgesia and sedation are commonly prescribed therapies within the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Current guidelines recommend utilizing an analgesia-first approach to initially reach appropriate pain control, while potentially achieving sedation goals concurrently. Our system employs a guideline-based ICU sedation order-set that features an electronic medical record (EMR) integrated ICU checklist that combines analgesia and sedation.

aimTo identify systems-based factors that are associated with the use of continuous midazolam infusion administration in mechanically ventilated patients.

methodsWe extracted EMR data from patients who received mechanical ventilation between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Subjects included were 18 years or older who received mechanical ventilation. "R" version 4.3.2 was used for data processing and statistical analysis. We performed a multivariable regression analysis to predict the administration of a continuous midazolam infusion with modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Charlson comorbidity index, and critical care medicine (CCM) primary service.

resultsOf 3805 patients that underwent mechanical ventilation, 62% were male, with a mean age of 66.9 years. 3429 patients were treated by a provider team with a CCM attending, and 376 patients were managed by a non-CCM primary team with CCM consultative services. A midazolam infusion was used in 187 of 3429 (5%) patients with CCM as primary and in 166 of 376 (56%) patients with non-CCM primary (

conclusionContinuous midazolam infusion was more likely in patients admitted to the ICU under an open unit with a non-CCM physician with an intensivist consult available, despite guided order-sets and checklists integrated into the EMR.

Indexed as

AnalgosedationCritical care medicineDeliriumIntensive care unitMidazolam infusion

Identifiers

PMID41377525
PMCPMC12687074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.