ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Probing the limited oculomotor range of common marmosets
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to scan visual scenes to gather information is a critical adaptive skill across primates. The common marmoset, a small-bodied New World monkey and emerging model of social and visual neuroscience, relies heavily on rapid head movements in addition to eye movements to orient (Pandey et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2025). Previous studies have found a relatively restricted oculomotor range extending out about 10 visual degrees from the central position of rest (Mitchell et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2025). However, previous studies have either used empty arenas for exploration (Singh et al., 2025), or in head-fixed animals used exploration of images potentially biased centrally with posed stimuli (Mitchell et al., 2014). This leaves open questions about whether this restricted oculomotor range is due to physical constraints or a lack of attention-drawing stimuli in the periphery. Understanding marmosets' oculomotor range is important for applying modern methods that use marker-less pose tracking of the head as a proxy for gaze direction, under the assumption eye gaze is relatively restricted and can be ignored (Meisner et al., 2025). Using high-precision eye tracking and free-viewing of a natural image and video with objects of interest placed in the periphery, we quantified the oculomotor range of head-fixed marmosets. Our results show limited changes in the range reported from previous studies, even with naturalistic stimuli including moving animals that were optimized to encourage peripheral viewing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.