ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Laparoscopy in pediatric urology: from inception to innovation - a comprehensive review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic urology has marked a significant advancement in pediatric surgery, offering less invasive procedures and improved postoperative outcomes. Initially utilized for diagnosing cryptorchidism in 1976, its therapeutic applications expanded in the 1990s to include surgeries such as orchiopexy, nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, etc. Laparoscopy, as a minimally invasive technique, allows visualization and treatment of abdominal and pelvic organs. The therapeutic potential of laparoscopy emerged in the 1990s, when Clayman and colleagues performed the first laparoscopic nephrectomy, marking the start of therapeutic laparoscopy. Since then, it has evolved significantly, becoming a standard approach in many pediatric urology centers. Technological advancements, particularly the development of miniature equipment and robotic-assisted surgery, have transformed pediatric laparoscopy, making it feasible even for neonates and infants. However, challenges persist, including increased expenses, a steep learning curve, and the need for compelling evidence before newer technologies are widely implemented. Future directions include improving telemedicine support, investigating pediatric-specific procedures, and integrating novelties such as single-site laparoscopy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. While laparoscopic techniques have significantly advanced, further research is required to assess long-term results, cost-effectiveness, and the psychological impact on children. This narrative review highlights the revolutionary impact of laparoscopy on pediatric urology, emphasizing the need for ongoing research, training, and global collaboration to optimize outcomes and ensure wider accessibility. By addressing these challenges and refining new technologies, the future of laparoscopy in pediatric urology appears promising, with the potential to significantly improve the lives of young patients with urological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.