ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Giant fibroepithelial stromal polyp of vulva: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fibroepithelial stromal polyps (FESPs) are rare benign mesenchymal tumors of the vulva, usually measuring 1-2 cm and often discovered incidentally. Lesions larger than 5 cm are uncommon, and those exceeding 20 cm are extremely rare, with very few reported cases in the literature. Case presentation: We report the case of a 24-year-old female who presented with a gradually enlarging vulvar mass over 4 years. Initially small, the lesion eventually grew to approximately 20 × 15 cm, causing difficulty in walking and mild discomfort. On physical examination, a large, pedunculated mass was noted arising from the right lateral vulvar wall, extending postero-inferiorly into the gluteal cleft and medial aspects of both thighs. Preoperative pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed a well-defined, homogeneously enhancing mass measuring 13 × 12.5 × 14.8 cm, suggestive of a giant fibroepithelial stromal polyp. The mass was surgically excised, and histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of fibroepithelial stromal polyp. Discussion: Giant vulvar fibroepithelial stromal polyps are exceptionally rare, particularly those measuring more than 20 cm. These lesions can present with significant morbidity due to their size and location, posing both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This case highlights the importance of considering FESP in the differential diagnosis of large vulvar masses and the role of imaging and histology in accurate diagnosis and management. Conclusion: Early identification and surgical excision of large fibroepithelial stromal polyps are crucial to prevent complications and improve patient quality of life. This case adds valuable insight into this rare clinical entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.