ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Augmented reality-driven organ deformation modeling: a roadmap for next-generation intraoperative navigation.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in abdominal wall hernia surgery: clinical applications and translational readiness.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate intraoperative modeling of organ deformation is essential for translating augmented reality (AR) guidance into measurable clinical benefit. This editorial evaluates deformation-aware AR systems for intraoperative guidance, emphasizing how precise deformation modeling can reduce targeting errors, shorten operative time, and lower procedure-related complications. We review three principal algorithmic strategies: physics-based biomechanical models (e.g., finite-element methods), data-driven image-registration and deep-learning techniques, and hybrid sensor-informed frameworks and summarize representative applications in neurosurgery (brain-shift compensation), hepatic, and thoracic interventions. Key translational barriers are discussed: real-time performance, validation against objective error metrics, workflow integration, regulatory pathways, and equitable access. We also address ethical considerations and data stewardship. We recommend prospective clinical trials with measurable endpoints (resection-margin accuracy, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rates, operative duration, and length of stay) and propose a translational roadmap emphasizing multimodal integration, standardization, and clinician training. Coordinated technical and clinical validation could establish deformation-aware AR as a validated intraoperative tool to improve surgical precision and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.