ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Testicular cancer: a bibliometric review of the Middle East and North African region.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy diagnosed in young men. The incidence of testicular cancer has been on the rise over the last decades including in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Our objective is to perform a review on research publications from countries in the MENA region about Testicular cancer and map these results across the cancer care pathway. Main body: A search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, and Scopus about testicular cancer and the MENA region between 2000 and 2020. Research output, publication trends, study designs, research questions, funding, collaborations, authors affiliation, and author gender disparities were assessed across the MENA region. Our search yielded a total of 1026 publications of which 462 articles were selected. There has been a steady rise in publications over these 20 years. It was notable that Turkey had the largest proportion (56.7%) accounting for 262 publications. Testicular cancer publications across the cancer care pathway showed that most studies focused on diagnosis (48.9%), whereas the most common study type was case reports (48.3%). Female authorship was mostly present in basic science publications 82% whereas female presence was only evident in 57.1% of publications. Conclusion: Several limitations hinder testicular cancer research in the MENA region. Analysis of the collected data revealed significant gaps related to a low number of impactful original articles, randomized controlled trials, and basic science research. Potential areas for improvement include creation of standardized oncology registries, increasing research related funding, and expanding collaborations with healthcare institutions abroad.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.