ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Wearable exoskeletons as catalysts for postoperative recovery and rehabilitation.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable robotic exoskeletons are emerging as pivotal tools in postoperative recovery, enabling early mobilization through powered joint assistance. This letter discusses their clinical and technological relevance in accelerating functional rehabilitation. Meta-analyses and clinical studies have demonstrated superior outcomes in joint motion, gait performance, and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional therapy. Devices such as Japan's HAL (Hybrid Assistive Limb) and Honda Walking Assist exemplify the fusion of biomechanics and AI-driven control, providing customizable torque support and real-time feedback. Implementation in Japan, Taiwan, the United States, and Europe underscores global recognition of their utility. Future research should focus on multicenter trials and ethical integration frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.