ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Transcatheter mitral valve repair: a paradigm shift in mitral regurgitation treatment.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in developed countries, particularly affecting the elderly population. In its severe, untreated form, MR is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current therapeutic approaches include pharmacological management, surgical interventions, and emerging transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) techniques. While medical therapy provides symptomatic relief, it lacks disease-modifying effects in advanced cases. Surgical repair or replacement remains the gold standard; however, it is often unsuitable for high-risk or inoperable patients. TMVR has emerged as a transformative, minimally invasive alternative, offering improved outcomes with reduced procedural risks. Devices such as MitraClip, Cardio band, and other novel TMVR technologies have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials, improving survival rates and quality of life. Despite its advantages, challenges such as anatomical variability, device durability, and long-term efficacy remain. With continuous technological advancements, optimized patient selection, and collaborative efforts in research and innovation, TMVR is poised to revolutionize the management of MR, bridging the gap between conventional surgery and medical therapy. This editorial explores the current landscape, benefits, limitations, and future directions of TMVR in the treatment of MR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.