Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377189›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Iranian Scientometrics; Dataset on universities, professors and articles.

Mohmmad Shafei, Parsa Zahedi, Rojiar Pirmohamadiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohmmad ShafeiComputer Engineering Graduate, University of Kurdistan, Pasdaran Blvd., Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province, I.R. 6617715175, Iran.
Parsa ZahediComputer Engineering Graduate, University of Kurdistan, Pasdaran Blvd., Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province, I.R. 6617715175, Iran.
Rojiar PirmohamadianiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Pasdaran Blvd., Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province, I.R. 6617715175, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research introduces a comprehensive dataset of academic publications and professorial metrics from Iranian universities, systematically collected from Google Scholar using Python-based tools such as Selenium and BeautifulSoup, validated through expert review. articles.csv was kept raw except for exact duplicate removal, while a four-step Data Refinement Process (governmental affiliation, ≥ 100 citations, author-article verification, 2020-22 window) produced final_articles.csv for analysis. The dataset includes over 1.5 million records of articles scraped from various categories, providing detailed information on each article's title, citations, authorship details, and institutional affiliations, all curated through an intricate web scraping process. It spans multiple interlinked files with attributes including article metadata, professor profiles, and institutional details, We then applied a temporal filter (2020-2022) in conjunction with institution and author-level criteria, restricting to governmental universities and professors exceeding our citation threshold, and excluded records missing essential metadata (specifically, entries without titles or with removed/invalid Google Scholar links), yielding a focused cohort primed for downstream analytical pipelines. These attributes enable in-depth exploration of academic productivity, collaboration networks, and institutional performance across disciplines. The dataset provides a significant foundation for developing domain-specific models and theories related to academic impact and network analysis, with potential applications in social network analysis, trend identification in research disciplines, and benchmarking within the academic landscape. Additionally, it may support the development of machine learning and deep learning models for classifying research outputs and analysing scholarly trends, driving innovation in understanding academic ecosystems and informing data-driven strategies to enhance research excellence. This dataset is intended for use by scientometricians conducting citation and network analyses, university administrators performing institutional benchmarking, policymakers evaluating research strategies, and academic researchers exploring disciplinary trends. To remain fully compliant while capturing the complete corpus, we throttled requests far below Google Scholar's implicit limits and deliberately distributed the crawl over a three-month window, trading speed for a policy-conformant, loss-minimised harvest. In short, we rate-limited requests, avoided circumvention, and did not bypass access controls; we acknowledge Google's ToS restrict automated queries.

Indexed as

BibliometricsGoogle scholarInstitutional researchScientometricsWeb scraping

Identifiers

PMID41377189
PMCPMC12686937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.