Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377182›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Traffic sign dataset for connected and automated vehicle operations in rural areas.

Mohammed Zakaria, Tesfamichael Getahun, Ali Karimoddini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed ZakariaNorth Carolina A&T State University,1601 East Market Street, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Greensboro, NC 27411, US.
Tesfamichael GetahunNorth Carolina A&T State University,1601 East Market Street, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Greensboro, NC 27411, US.
Ali KarimoddiniNorth Carolina A&T State University,1601 East Market Street, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Greensboro, NC 27411, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate traffic sign recognition is essential for the safe operation of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs). However, many existing datasets, such as the LISA Traffic Sign Dataset, are predominantly composed of signs found in urban environments, offering limited representation of those common in rural settings. To address this gap, this article introduces an augmented LISA Traffic Sign Dataset that includes rural-specific traffic signs such as deer crossing, cattle crossing, and farm machinery warning signs. The dataset was compiled through a combination of real-world data collection using frames extracted from rural driving videos, and screenshots taken from google map street view. The dataset increased the number of classes in the original LISA Traffic Sign Dataset from 47 to 55 classes. Experiments conducted using a YOLOv11 -based recognition model demonstrated that the augmented dataset improved recognition performance, achieving an overall mean Average Precision (mAP) of 98.7 %, compared to 97.0 % with the original dataset. Precision and recall for the augmented dataset also increased form 95.5 % and 95.1 % to 96.7 % and 97.5 %, respectively. This expanded dataset is intended to support the development and benchmarking of recognition systems for rural CAV deployments and is structured to enable reuse in related research areas, including infrastructure assessment, rural navigation systems, and intelligent transportation studies.

Indexed as

Autonomous drivingDeep learningIntelligent transportation systemsObject detectionTraffic sign detection

Identifiers

PMID41377182
PMCPMC12686923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.