ReviewRSC advances2025
MOF-based catalysts for sustainable biodiesel production: classification, performance, and advances from 2020 to 2025.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which modification for which feedstock? a strategy-by-strategy review of Zr-MOF catalysts for biodiesel production.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Their Derivatives for Environmental Remediation and Energy Devices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrated assessment of CI engine combustion and catalyst durability with graphene- infused Pongamia pinnata biodiesel.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global energy demand and environmental concerns have intensified the search for renewable fuels, with biodiesel emerging as a sustainable substitute for petroleum diesel. Efficient catalysis remains the bottleneck for large-scale biodiesel production. While heterogeneous catalysts offer advantages of reusability and separation, their performance is limited by stability, active sites availability, and reduced activity under harsh conditions. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), with their high surface area, tunable porosity, and structural versatility, have recently attracted increasing attention as next-generation catalysts. This work reviewed advances in the design and application of each common MOF type for biodiesel synthesis through esterification and transesterification process. MOF composites, MOF derivatives, and MOF composite materials exhibit superior catalytic performance and recyclability compared to pristine MOFs, making them highly recommended for future research and applications. Beyond summarizing yields and reaction conditions, we highlight mechanistic insights, stability issues, and catalysis performance. Special attention is given to functionalized and composite MOFs, bifunctional systems, and enzyme-MOF hybrids, which demonstrate superior performance compared to pristine MOFs. While UiO- and ZIF-based MOFs dominate current research, emerging systems such as Ca- and Cu-MOFs remain underexplored yet promising. We analyze the key features required in MOF materials for efficient biodiesel production and provide a comprehensive review and categorization of recent advancements. By contrasting MOFs with conventional heterogeneous catalysts and positioning this review against existing literature, we provide a comprehensive and critical perspective on the opportunities and challenges of MOFs in biodiesel catalysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.