Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377137›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025

Targeting proteostasis pathways for cancer therapy.

Xiaofeng Dai, Ruohan Lyu, Guanqun Ge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaofeng DaiNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Shaanxi Provincial Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Ruohan LyuDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Guanqun GeDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The critical role of protein disequilibrium in driving carcinogenesis has long been recognized. Though several inhibitors of heat shock protein (HSP) family members have entered clinical trials, none of them have been approved for clinical use as a result of inevitable toxicity, leading to the identification of safer therapeutic approaches sharing a similar efficacy relevant and urgent. Through delineating the role of HSP90 inhibitors in arresting cancer hallmarks, this paper identified HSP90 inhibition as an effective therapeutic strategy capable of concomitantly targeting multiple key transformed properties of cancers via modulating cellular proteostasis. Through interrogating intrinsic connections between proteostasis and redox homeostasis, this paper proposed cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) as a possible alternative of HSP90 inhibitors with little adverse effects. This paper extended the therapeutic spectrum of HSP90 inhibitors and CAP to inflammation-driven pathologies including autoimmune diseases, as inflammation is a manifestation of failed proteostasis. These insights may conceptually advance our understandings on the driving force of cancers that can be easily extended to other disorders originated from imbalanced proteostasis and abnormal inflammation. Tools proposed here for inhibiting HSP90 including CAP and its possible synergy with HSP90 inhibitors may shift the current treatment paradigm to a new avenue in oncology and other relevant fields.

Indexed as

Autoimmune disorderCancerCold atmospheric plasmaHSP90 inhibitorProteostasisRedox homeostasis

Identifiers

PMID41377137
PMCPMC12686708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.