ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025
The Pros and Cons of Using Earth's High Background Radiation Areas as an Analog for Mars Colonization: A Critical Analysis.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The establishment of a Martian colony is one of the most significant technological challenges currently facing humanity. The journey and the Martian environment present numerous obstacles, making this mission extremely complex. However, extensive research is underway to investigate the viability of a Mars expedition and settlement. If humans are to stay on Mars for an extended period, they will need to overcome several challenges, including the high levels of space radiation and microgravity. Even if all necessities for human colonization on Mars are provided, high levels of ionizing radiation remain a critical issue. This study aims to address the potential risks and long-term effects of radiation exposure in challenging environments like Mars by reviewing the health effects of individuals on Earth who live under similar conditions and experience comparable radiation exposure. Specifically, it highlights the crucial importance of the studies on the health effects of individuals who currently live or migrate to high background radiation areas like Ramsar, Iran, where residents of certain hot spots can receive up to 260 mSv per year, primarily due to the decay chain of radium-226. By acknowledging both the pros and cons of using Earth's high background radiation areas as an Analog for Mars colonization, and by employing a multifaceted approach, scientists can gain valuable insights to prepare for the challenges of human habitation on Mars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.