Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377125›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025

Artificial Neural Network for Optimizing Gamma Radiation Shielding.

Mahdieh Mokhtari Dorostkar, Fatemeh Sadat Rasouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahdieh Mokhtari DorostkarDepartment of Physics, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Fatemeh Sadat RasouliDepartment of Physics, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Designing shields for gamma radiation sources is particularly important due to their extensive use in medical, industrial, and research studies. Objective: This study aimed to explore the ability of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to identify the optimized shield for a typical gamma source. Despite the effectiveness of Monte Carlo simulations in determining optimal shielding materials and geometries, they are time-consuming and require numerous simulations for each configuration. Material and Methods: In this simulating study, the MCNPX Monte Carlo code was utilized to conduct simulations using a previously proposed shielding material. After validating the simulation accuracy, a large dataset was generated to serve as input and target data for the machine learning process. The method's precision was assessed by comparing the results of the ANN with those of Monte Carlo simulations. Dose calculations were performed using a water phantom. Results: The deviation of less than 1% was computed between the simulation and the ANN. The network also exhibited satisfactory predictions for unknown data. Additionally, the dose was evaluated using a water phantom to assess further and optimize the selected shielding material. Conclusion: The ANNs are widespread and significant in radiation shielding studies. The developed network can accurately predict unknown weight fraction combinations. The designed network can effectively predict unknown weight fraction combinations.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDoseExposureGamma RadiationMachine LearningMonte Carlo MethodPhantomShielding

Identifiers

PMID41377125
PMCPMC12686668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.