ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025
Artificial Neural Network for Optimizing Gamma Radiation Shielding.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Designing shields for gamma radiation sources is particularly important due to their extensive use in medical, industrial, and research studies. Objective: This study aimed to explore the ability of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to identify the optimized shield for a typical gamma source. Despite the effectiveness of Monte Carlo simulations in determining optimal shielding materials and geometries, they are time-consuming and require numerous simulations for each configuration. Material and Methods: In this simulating study, the MCNPX Monte Carlo code was utilized to conduct simulations using a previously proposed shielding material. After validating the simulation accuracy, a large dataset was generated to serve as input and target data for the machine learning process. The method's precision was assessed by comparing the results of the ANN with those of Monte Carlo simulations. Dose calculations were performed using a water phantom. Results: The deviation of less than 1% was computed between the simulation and the ANN. The network also exhibited satisfactory predictions for unknown data. Additionally, the dose was evaluated using a water phantom to assess further and optimize the selected shielding material. Conclusion: The ANNs are widespread and significant in radiation shielding studies. The developed network can accurately predict unknown weight fraction combinations. The designed network can effectively predict unknown weight fraction combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.