Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377084›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Applying self-determination theory to behavior change technologies: insights from two projects in the health domain.

Rebecca Gerstenberg, Emil Rosenlund Høeg, Jolene Van der Kaap-Deeder, Marc Hassenzahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca GerstenbergUbiquitous Design/Experience and Interaction, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany.
Emil Rosenlund HøegMultisensory Experience Lab, Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, The Technical Faculty of IT and Design, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jolene Van der Kaap-DeederDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Marc HassenzahlUbiquitous Design/Experience and Interaction, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the health domain, patients often need to adopt and maintain behaviors that are tedious, unpleasant, or even painful, such as taking medication regularly, being more physically active, or maintaining a diet. Behavior change technologies (BCTs) can play a crucial role in instilling change and maintaining healthy behaviors. One psychological theory to guide the design of BCTs is Self-Determination Theory (SDT). However, researchers within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) struggle with its application, as the field lacks a shared understanding and reflection on the use of SDT. We present two HCI research projects in the health domain and reflect on the role SDT played in their implementation. Through a comparative analysis, we found that SDT was helpful in providing an analytical focus and guiding quantitative evaluations. However, its adaptation to qualitative methods and explicit design guidelines presents difficulties. Our reflection underscored the potential of SDT as both a theoretical lens and practical design tool for developing autonomy-supportive health technologies.

Indexed as

autonomous motivationhealth behavior changereflectionrehabilitationself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID41377084
PMCPMC12685826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.