ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Reliability and validity testing of the Chinese version of the self-directed learning scale among middle school students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Self-Directed Learning Scale (SDLS) among 979 middle school students in China. Methods: The scale was translated and culturally adapted using Brislin's and Beaton's cross-cultural procedures. Analyses conducted with SPSS 29.0 and Amos 26.0 included assessments of internal consistency, content validity, and structural validity. Results: The SDLS demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.882; McDonald's ω = 0.887; CR = 0.887) and excellent content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.980). Exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor structure (KMO = 0.895), which was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (χ Discussion: The findings indicate that the Chinese SDLS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing self-directed learning in adolescents. It provides a practical tool for learner profiling and educational planning within China's performance-oriented yet increasingly student-centered context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.