ArticleBrain & spine2025
No ICU Unless 2.0 - Refining ICU admission criteria after elective craniotomy.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A cost-sensitive multiclass machine learning framework for postoperative neurosurgical triage (Neuro-TACTIC).Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Routine intensive care unit (ICU) admission following elective craniotomy is still standard practice in most neurosurgical centers, despite growing evidence supporting selective monitoring strategies. Research question: We aimed to refine ICU admission criteria by identifying predictors of ultimately required postoperative ICU transfers and by developing a pragmatic risk score. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients who underwent elective craniotomy from 2021 to 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: Cohort A included patients transferred to the general ward as planned, while Cohort B included those requiring unplanned ICU admission after initial general ward assignment. Baseline and surgical characteristics, complication rates and outcome parameters were compared. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of ultimately required ICU admission. A risk score was developed based on significant predictors. Results: Of 1441 patients undergoing elective craniotomy, 1162 (81 %) were preoperatively scheduled for postoperative care on the general ward. Of these, 153 patients (13 %) required unplanned ICU admission. Analysis identified independent risk factors: surgical time >143 min (OR 4.73; p < 0.0001), blood loss >500 mL (OR 1.89; p = 0.0098), age >72 years (OR 2.18; p = 0.0037), and intraventricular lesion location (OR 16.92; p < 0.0001). A 3-point risk score was constructed, with ICU admission rates increasing from 2.5 % (0 points) to 36 % (3 points). Discussion and conclusions: Selective ICU admission after elective craniotomy appears safe when guided by risk assessment. The score may support clinical decision-making, reduce unnecessary ICU utilization, and promote resource-efficient postoperative care - even in complex or infratentorial cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.