ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Prediction of EGFR mutation status and mutation sites in lung cancer based on radiomics and deep learning.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are regarded as key predictors for the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with exon 19 mutations demonstrating a better prognosis compared to exon 21 mutations. Therefore, accurate identification of EGFR mutations and their specific loci (e.g., exon 19 Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from 557 NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR genotyping. Radiomics features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) images, and machine learning models, including support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR), were developed for mutation prediction. Deep learning architectures (ResNet-18 and DenseNet-121) were further employed to extract high-dimensional features from CT images. A combined model integrating radiomics, deep learning, and clinical data was constructed to predict EGFR mutation status and mutation subtypes. Results: The combined model achieved superior performance in predicting EGFR mutation status [area under the curve (AUC): 91.1%, accuracy: 85.6%] and specific mutation sites (AUC: 93.6%, accuracy: 89.9%). Compared to radiomics models, the combined model demonstrated statistically significant improvements (P<0.05). Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed the clinical applicability of the models in patient stratification and personalized treatment planning. Conclusions: The integration of radiomics and deep learning offers a non-invasive, accurate method for predicting EGFR mutations and subtypes in NSCLC. This integrated approach demonstrates significant potential to optimize clinical decision-making and enable personalized treatment regimens in NSCLC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.