ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Effect of cardiovascular risk factors on overall survival in postoperative patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of left gastric artery lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) may share common risk factors. This study aimed to explore the association between modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and prognosis in ESCC patients after radical surgery, as well as their impact on survival outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 497 postoperative patients with stage II-III ESCC from Fujian Provincial Hospital. Modifiable CVRFs, including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, high body mass index (BMI), and smoking, were evaluated for their impact on overall survival (OS). Patients were categorized into low-CVRF and high-CVRF groups based on the number of combined CVRF, followed by a 60-month follow-up. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) was used to survival analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was performed for prognosis-related variable selection. Finally, Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess survival associations, with adjustment for confounding factors. Results: After adjusting for confounders, diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) =1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-2.72; P<0.001] and hypertension (HR =1.28; 95% CI: 0.96-1.72; P=0.09) were associated with worse OS, among which diabetes was an independent risk factor. The high-CVRF group had worse OS (HR =1.54; 95% CI: 1.14-2.08; P=0.005), and for each additional CVRF, the risk of adverse OS increased significantly (HR =1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.31; P=0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that the negative impact of high-CVRFs on OS was more significant in the chemoradiotherapy subgroups: the chemotherapy subgroup (HR =2.62; 95% CI: 1.71-4.01; P<0.001) and the radiotherapy subgroup (HR =2.01; 95% CI: 1.19-3.40; P=0.009). Diabetic patients had poorer prognosis in the chemotherapy subgroup (HR =3.72; 95% CI: 2.24-6.18; P<0.001) and the radiotherapy subgroup (HR =3.08; 95% CI: 1.65-5.75; P<0.001). Conclusions: Diabetes is an independent risk factor for worse OS in patients with stage II-III ESCC after radical surgery. The cumulative burden of CVRFs (especially high-CVRFs) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative mortality, and this association is more prominent in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. These findings suggest that individualized cardiovascular risk monitoring and treatment strategies should be developed in clinical practice for ESCC patients with comorbid CVRFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.