ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Predictors of forced vital capacity response to immunosuppression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a retrospective cohort analysis of 203 patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efficacy of targeted immunosuppression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (f-HP) remains uncertain due to a lack of controlled studies. We assessed predictors of acute treatment response to immunosuppression (3 to 9 months) in patients with either newly diagnosed or established progressive f-HP. Methods: Patients with f-HP who received corticosteroids (CS) and/or steroid-sparing agents (SSA) [mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine (AZA)] with pulmonary function test (PFT) at baseline and three to six months after treatment initiation were included. An absolute increase in percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) of at least 5% within six months of treatment initiation was deemed a positive response. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline covariables associated with treatment response. Results: Among 203 treated patients, 29% had an acute response in FVC%. Male sex [adjusted odds ratio (OR) =0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.69, P=0.003], radiologic honeycombing (adjusted OR =0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.90, P=0.03), and higher baseline FVC% (adjusted OR =0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99, P=0.01) were associated with reduced likelihoods of treatment response. Newly diagnosed patients had a greater likelihood of treatment response (adjusted OR =2.59, 95% CI: 1.35-5.09, P=0.005), while in established disease, only causative antigen identification was predictive of treatment response (adjusted OR =3.52, 95% CI: 1.15-10.73, P=0.03). Conclusions: Male sex, radiologic honeycombing, and higher FVC% at baseline were associated with lower odds of treatment response, while newly diagnosed and untreated patients were more likely to respond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.