ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Electronic patient-reported outcomes for outpatient care after non-intubated thoracic surgery in early-stage lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical research advances in thoracic surgery and thoracic oncology in 2025: a panoramic narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-intubated thoracic surgery (NITS) is a promising alternative to conventional double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) surgery, aiming to reduce airway trauma and accelerate recovery. However, its impact on the patient's subjective experience, particularly after discharge, is not well-documented. This study aimed to compare the perioperative recovery and patient-reported outcomes between NITS and DLT surgery, utilizing electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) as a key measurement tool for postoperative symptom surveillance. Methods: In this prospective, single-center cohort study, 60 patients scheduled for thoracoscopic resection between March and December 2023 were consecutively allocated to either the NITS group (n=30) or the DLT group (n=30). Both groups received standardized perioperative nursing care, while the NITS group additionally received targeted breathing training and enhanced intra-/postoperative respiratory support. ePROs covering nine symptom domains were collected daily during hospitalization and on postoperative days 7 and 30 after discharge. Conventional surgical metrics were also recorded. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent-samples Results: Compared to the DLT group, NITS significantly reduced median hospital stay (3.47 Conclusions: NITS combined with enhanced recovery protocol is a feasible and safe approach that enhances early recovery while enabling proactive, personalized outpatient symptom management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.