ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Pemetrexed plus platinum outperforms other platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for resected stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma: an open-label, historical-control study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early-stage lung adenocarcinoma has the potential to achieve long-term survival through radical surgery and appropriate adjuvant therapy. Despite rapid advancements in perioperative treatment strategies, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy remains critically valuable. However, the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen is yet to be established. Therefore, we initiated this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed (PEM) plus platinum versus other platinum-based regimes as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma after radical surgery to provide further clinical practice evidence. Methods: We performed a non-randomized, open-label, historical-control study. Seventy-one patients with pathologic stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma who had undergone complete resection were prospectively enrolled, all of whom received pemetrexed combined with platinum adjuvant chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. In addition, we retrospectively collected the data from 209 patients recorded between January 2003 and December 2021 with pathologic stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma who received radical surgery followed by adjuvant non-PEM (paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine) plus platinum as historical control. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for DFS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to generate best-matched pairs for the two categories. All adverse events (AEs) were collected and compared. Results: In the prospective group, the median follow-up was 45.6 months (interquartile range, 40.3-55.7 months). Thirty-five of the 71 prospective patients developed disease progression, and 2-year DFS was 67.61%. The median DFS was not reached in the PEM group, compared with 18.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.6-22.0] in the non-PEM group. In the overall unmatched population, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in DFS with PEM (median DFS not reached Conclusions: This study showed that PEM plus platinum outperforms non-PEM plus platinum as an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for resected stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma and with better tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.