ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Global trends and hotspots in research of cough variant asthma: a bibliometric and visual analysis from 2004 to 2024.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The field of cough variant asthma (CVA) has seen rapid development, with a significant number of high-quality studies being published. To explore the evolution, key research trends, and future prospects of this field, a bibliometric and visualization analysis was conducted. Methods: Publications concerning CVA were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection, and subsequently processed with VOSviewer 1.6.18, CiteSpace 6.1.R3, and the Bibliometric Online Analysis Platform to perform visualization and bibliometric analyses. Results: We included 424 studies in the analysis. Over the past two decades, research output grew steadily and reached its maximum in the last six years. China led in publication quantity, whereas Japan had the strongest influence in terms of scholarly impact. At the institutional level, Guangzhou Medical University contributed the most work, and the Conclusions: The field of CVA has developed into a significant research area, with high-impact authors, journals, and institutions contributing to the exploration of various key topics. Among these, the diagnosis of CVA, especially in children, remains an area with considerable potential for further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.