Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376939›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Feasibility of extracting key elements from thoracic surgical operative notes using foundational large language models.

Vamshi Mugu, Vera Sorin, Alex Chan, Casey Briggs, Brendan Carr, Mike Olson, John Schupbach, John Zietlow, Sahar Saddoughi, John Schmitz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vamshi MuguDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1390-6031
Vera SorinDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alex ChanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Casey BriggsDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brendan CarrDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mike OlsonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John SchupbachDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John ZietlowDepartment of Trauma, Critical Care, and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sahar SaddoughiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John SchmitzDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashish KhandelwalDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Operative notes contain key information vital to subsequent care of the patient; however, manual extraction of this information can be time-consuming. Large language models (LLMs) offer promise in this regard. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using LLMs to automatically extract key elements from thoracic surgical operative notes. Methods: We instructed three LLMs, Gemini, ChatGPT, and LLaMA to extract key information from 116 thoracic surgery operative notes. A blinded thoracic surgeon assessed accuracy, while two blinded physicians (an emergency physician and a radiologist) recorded the time needed to extract the key elements ("approach", "purpose of the procedure", "complications", and "devices left") manually and using LLM construct. Results: Gemini demonstrated the highest overall accuracy (95.3%), followed by ChatGPT (93.1%) and LLaMA (87.7%). The mean time to extract key elements was significantly lower when using LLMs: 22.1 Conclusions: With appropriate human supervision, LLMs can be used to automatically extract key information from thoracic surgical operative notes. Using LLMs for this task can save clinician time significantly, without compromising accuracy. Due to the availability of several LLM choices, including open- and closed-source, comparative evaluation is beneficial to address specific needs and constraints.

Indexed as

generative artificial intelligence (generative AI)Large language models (LLMs)operative notesthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41376939
PMCPMC12688562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.