ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Development and validation of a multi-center prognostic model for predicting survival in non-small cell lung cancer using pulmonary and hematological data.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a prognostic prediction model for critically ill lung cancer patients based on respiratory functional reserve and systemic inflammatory characteristics.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prognostic stratification in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging due to heterogeneous outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinically applicable prognostic model using multi-dimensional clinical data to improve survival prediction and support personalized therapeutic decisions. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 1,013 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC treated at at Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Dazhu County People's Hospital and West China Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020. Inclusion criteria comprised adults with untreated, non-metastatic NSCLC, while those with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe comorbidities, or concurrent malignancies were excluded. We utilized demographic, clinicopathological, and biochemical data, with follow-ups conducted via telephone. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Predictors included pulmonary function [forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV)], blood biomarkers [total serum bilirubin (TBIL)], and clinicopathological features. Variables were selected via backward stepwise regression with Akaike's information criterion. Performance was assessed using the C-index, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The model was developed using a Cox proportional hazards model on a training set (n=513), tested on an internal set (n=219), and externally validated on a cohort from two other hospitals (n=281). FEV1, MVV, smoking, pathological stage, and TBIL emerged as significant prognostic factors, with C-index values of 0.740, 0.734, and 0.746 in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. The AUC values for 3- and 5-year OS predictions exceeded 0.70, highlighting strong model performance. Calibration plots confirmed predictive accuracy across datasets, and DCA highlighted clinical utility, especially in long-term risk stratification. Conclusions: We developed a prognostic model for NSCLC integrating pulmonary function, biochemical, and clinicopathological data. The prognostic model provides significant clinical implications, facilitating tailored treatment planning and prognostic evaluations for NSCLC patients. Its integration into routine clinical practice could enhance decision-making processes and potentially improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.