ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Slow-firing mode reduces stump oozing during pulmonary vessel stapling.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of the utility of slow mode for pulmonary vessel resection using a surgical stapler in anatomical pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial protocol.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Central vascular stump oozing after pulmonary vessel stapling remains a clinically relevant challenge in thoracic surgery. Powered staplers are standard, but the optimal firing speed for minimizing bleeding has not been established. We evaluated whether the slow-firing mode reduces intraoperative stump oozing compared with the default fast-firing mode. Methods: This retrospective two-center cohort study analyzed 276 pulmonary vessel stapling events (168 slow-firing and 108 fast-firing) during anatomic pulmonary resections performed with a powered stapler (Signia™, Medtronic) that allows manual adjustment of firing speed. The primary outcome was stump oozing lasting ≥15 seconds after vascular transection. Secondary outcomes included the need for hemostatic intervention and stapling time. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable logistic regression were applied to adjust for baseline and intraoperative confounders, including vessel type, vessel diameter, and intraoperative mechanical stress (lifting, twisting, and traction). Results: Stump oozing occurred in 23.2% of stapling events. The incidence was significantly lower in the slow-firing group than in the fast-firing group (17.9% Conclusions: Slow-firing mode significantly reduced the incidence of prolonged stump oozing from central vascular stumps, particularly during PA transection. These findings suggest that selective use of slow-firing mode may represent a simple and practical strategy to improve staple-line security, although confirmation in larger prospective studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.