ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025
Sustained breath-holds in bronchoscopy: a pause worth taking?-a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Innovations in advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy have transformed our ability to biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions. Lesion movement throughout the respiratory cycle can reduce biopsy precision, particularly when targeting small nodules. To eliminate this, breath-hold (BH) maneuvers using apneic oxygenation have recently gained traction despite minimal data on their use during bronchoscopy. This narrative review explores the physiological basis, historical context, and early procedural use of apneic oxygenation in bronchoscopy, highlighting future research priorities. Methods: We reviewed studies published from inception through May 2025 using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. We focused on literature evaluating apneic oxygenation and BH maneuvers in procedural medicine, focusing on its historical development, physiology, feasibility, and its application in pulmonary procedures. Key Content and Findings: Prior studies have demonstrated that adequate oxygen delivery can be maintained through passive diffusion, supporting tissue perfusion in the absence of ventilation. However, carbon dioxide accumulates along a nonlinear trajectory, making the prediction of hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis challenging. Although well established in airway surgery, the application of apneic oxygenation in bronchoscopy is still evolving, with limited published data to guide its use. Future research should adopt a stepwise approach, beginning with safety and feasibility studies before progressing to comparative randomized trials. Conclusions: Sustained BH maneuvers are a novel strategy to increase procedural precision in advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy. Structured clinical research will be critical to defining its safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and role in routine clinical practice before widespread implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.