Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376907›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025

The value of continuous cough monitoring: a narrative review.

Mindaugas Galvosas, Peter M Small

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Converting a Cough Counter into a Cough Monitor: A Way Forward?Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mindaugas GalvosasResearch and Development Department, Hyfe Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-3309
Peter M SmallResearch and Development Department, Hyfe Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: We live in the era of precision health in which parameters of clinical importance are quantified and used to tailor therapies. However, cough is a common and informative sign and symptom which is generally not quantified. Recently, advances in acoustic artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled accurate, passive and privacy preserving continuous cough monitoring (CCM). Analytically and clinically validated CCM provides a reproducible and potentially clinically useful measurement of cough as a physiological signal-quantifying the burden and day-to-day variability, supporting earlier detection of deterioration, offering a sensitive endpoint in clinical trials and even contributing to population syndromic surveillance. The objective of this review is to critically appraise the evidence for such use cases and identify future directions for research in this field and clinical adoption. Methods: In this article, we reviewed the literature and summarised insights gained from CCM across various diseases, and discussed future directions for this emerging field. Key Content and Findings: CCM has already provided novel and important insights into the biology and therapy of specific diseases such as refractory and unexplained chronic cough, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis, congestive heart failure and gastroesophageal reflux. In addition, it has demonstrated aspects of cough as individuals go about their daily lives, such as the inter and intra-subject variability in daily cough frequency, diurnal and episodic patterns of cough, and the correlation between its subjective and objective measurement. Predictions are presented about future research and uses of cough monitoring. Conclusions: AI-enabled CCM is a powerful new tool that is already improving cough research and patient care.

Indexed as

bronchiectasisCoughcough monitoringrefractory chronic cough (RCC)wearables

Identifiers

PMID41376907
PMCPMC12688508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.