ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Development and validation of a multimodal radiomics-serum biomarker model for diagnosing solid pulmonary nodules via machine learning.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Globally, lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy, for which solid pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are a common radiographic finding. Given the high false-positive rates of computed tomography (CT) screening, we aimed to develop a multimodal diagnostic model combining CT radiomics features and serum biomarkers via machine learning. Methods: This retrospective study included patients receiving both preoperative CT screening and serum biomarker testing. All pulmonary nodules (PNs) were divided into training and validation sets randomly at a ratio of 7:3. We developed a multimodal diagnosis model based on the CT radiomics and protein biomarkers of SPNs in the training cohort. The CT radiomics features were derived from the integration of traditional radiomics analysis methods and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning techniques. The accuracy of this multimodal diagnosis model for the prediction of SPNs was verified in the validation set. Model performances were evaluated in terms of the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve. Results: Between February 2016 and December 2020, imaging data of 638 eligible PNs from CT scans of 633 different patients were collected. The multimodal model had satisfactory accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant SPNs in the training set [AUC =0.944; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.924-0.964]. In the validation set, the multimodal model yielded an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI: 0.889-0.964), an accuracy of 0.885, an NPV of 0.812, and a PPV of 0.927. The multimodal model also significantly outperformed the single-modality diagnostic models, including the traditional radiomics CT model (AUC =0.843; 95% CI: 0.780-0.906), the serum biomarker model (AUC =0.783; 95% CI: 0.718-0.847), and the 3D deep learning model (AUC =0.820; 95% CI: 0.754-0.885) (all P values <0.01). Conclusions: This study developed a novel multimodal that demonstrated superior performance in classifying SPNs. It may thus enhance the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions and provide support for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.