Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376905›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Development and validation of a multimodal radiomics-serum biomarker model for diagnosing solid pulmonary nodules via machine learning.

Kai Wang, Xu-Feng Deng, Zhi Zheng, Zi-Qi Huang, Shuang-Qing Liao, Si-Jin Liu, Zhuo-Xin Dai, Ji-Gang Dai, Quan-Xing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kai Wang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8152-5040
Xu-Feng Deng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhi ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zi-Qi HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shuang-Qing LiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Si-Jin LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhuo-Xin DaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ji-Gang DaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-8138
Quan-Xing LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy, for which solid pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are a common radiographic finding. Given the high false-positive rates of computed tomography (CT) screening, we aimed to develop a multimodal diagnostic model combining CT radiomics features and serum biomarkers via machine learning. Methods: This retrospective study included patients receiving both preoperative CT screening and serum biomarker testing. All pulmonary nodules (PNs) were divided into training and validation sets randomly at a ratio of 7:3. We developed a multimodal diagnosis model based on the CT radiomics and protein biomarkers of SPNs in the training cohort. The CT radiomics features were derived from the integration of traditional radiomics analysis methods and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning techniques. The accuracy of this multimodal diagnosis model for the prediction of SPNs was verified in the validation set. Model performances were evaluated in terms of the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve. Results: Between February 2016 and December 2020, imaging data of 638 eligible PNs from CT scans of 633 different patients were collected. The multimodal model had satisfactory accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant SPNs in the training set [AUC =0.944; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.924-0.964]. In the validation set, the multimodal model yielded an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI: 0.889-0.964), an accuracy of 0.885, an NPV of 0.812, and a PPV of 0.927. The multimodal model also significantly outperformed the single-modality diagnostic models, including the traditional radiomics CT model (AUC =0.843; 95% CI: 0.780-0.906), the serum biomarker model (AUC =0.783; 95% CI: 0.718-0.847), and the 3D deep learning model (AUC =0.820; 95% CI: 0.754-0.885) (all P values <0.01). Conclusions: This study developed a novel multimodal that demonstrated superior performance in classifying SPNs. It may thus enhance the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions and provide support for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

machine learningMultimodal diagnosisradiomicsserum biomarkerssolid pulmonary nodules (SPNs)

Identifiers

PMID41376905
PMCPMC12688578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.