ArticleClinical case reports2025
Drooling as a Red Flag: Insights From a Case Series in Severe Dermatomyositis With Literature Review.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drooling as a Red Flag: Insights From a Case Series in Severe Dermatomyositis With Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare idiopathic inflammatory disease characterized by progressive proximal muscle weakness and distinctive dermatologic manifestations. Although dysphagia is a recognized complication of oropharyngeal muscle involvement, drooling (sialorrhea) is infrequently described and may be a marker of severe disease. This case series reports three adult patients with severe DM who presented with drooling, highlighting diagnostic challenges and therapeutic dilemmas in the management of refractory disease. All patients in the present study exhibited severe DM with prominent dysphagia, leading to drooling. Despite intensive immunosuppressive therapy, including high-dose corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulin, and Rituximab, the outcome was disappointing, highlighting the refractory nature of the disease. The patients experienced readmissions following the worsening of dysphagia and drooling, which eventually led to complications like aspiration pneumonia and sepsis and ultimately fatal outcomes. Anti-Ro52 and Anti-Nuclear Matrix Protein 2 (NXP2) antibodies correlated with a more severe disease course and poor prognosis. Although rare, drooling in DM may be a clinical marker of severe DM with extensive oropharyngeal involvement and an increased risk for life-threatening complications. Early evaluation and initiation of intensive combination therapy could improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to refine treatment protocols for this challenging manifestation of DM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.