Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376800›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2025

Scoping review of image-based overall survival prediction in glioma using machine learning.

Saman Mohammadpour, Hassan Emami, Reza Rabiei, Arash Roshanpoor, Morteza Tabatabaeefar, Fariborz Faeghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saman MohammadpourDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan Emami *Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza Rabiei *Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash RoshanpoorYadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza TabatabaeefarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fariborz FaeghiDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate prediction of overall survival (OS) in glioma patients is crucial for optimising treatment decisions. Despite advancements in imaging and machine learning, challenges persist due to tumour heterogeneity and confounding factors. This scoping review systematically assesses state-of-the-art image-based OS prediction models for glioma, focusing on tumour characteristics, imaging modalities, preprocessing techniques, and machine learning methods. Material and methods: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, comprising five key stages: identifying the research question, searching for relevant literature, selecting studies, charting the data, and collating, summarising, and reporting the results. Results: The initial search identified 3238 records, of which 70 articles were included in the final analysis. Most studies originated from China, the United States, and India, with datasets averaging approximately 450 cases. To enhance predictive accuracy, various techniques were utilised, including image segmentation, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, and advanced feature extraction methods. Notably, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI and grade-specific glioma analyses improved model performance. Although deep learning models generally outperformed traditional methods, they required large, balanced datasets. Hybrid models showed promising potential; however, their performance was inconsistent due to challenges such as limited image quality and issues with model interpretability. Conclusions: Increasing sample size alone does not guarantee improved accuracy in glioma prediction models, because data quality and feature selection are critical factors. Incorporating diverse imaging modalities can significantly enhance predictive performance. To ensure greater clinical reliability in decision-making, integrating clinical features with imaging data is essential.

Indexed as

gliomaimage analysisimage processingmachine learningoverall survivalprediction

Identifiers

PMID41376800
PMCPMC12687322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.