ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Latent class analysis and machine learning for clinical subtyping prediction and differentiation in suspected neurosyphilis patients.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimizing Off-Target Effects of CRISPR-Cas9 With Optimized sgRNA: Evaluation of Efficiency and Specificity in the Tumor Protein 53 (TP53) Region.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Pathogens of the Human Central Nervous System- the Major Bacterial Pathogens.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Neurosyphilis presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its heterogeneous clinical manifestations, absence of a gold-standard diagnostic criterion, and variable treatment responses. This study aims to identify clinically homogeneous subtypes of suspected neurosyphilis patients and develop a machine learning-based subtyping model to support clinical decision-making. Methods: Data from 451 suspected neurosyphilis patients were retrospectively collected from West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients were divided into a model development cohort (n=369) and an external validation cohort (n=82) by time. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify subtypes, with the optimal class number determined by model fit indicators. Key predictive variables were selected using LASSO regression and Boruta algorithm. Six machine learning algorithms were employed to build LCA subtype prediction models. Feature importance was interpreted via SHAP analysis, and model generalizability was assessed using the external cohort. Results: LCA classified patients into three homogeneous subtypes: "typical neurosyphilis" (43.7%; predominantly male, high serum TRUST titer, significant CSF abnormalities, and robust intrathecal immune activation), "atypical neurosyphilis" (17.9%; absence of elevated CSF protein, mild intrathecal IgG synthesis), "non-neurosyphilis" (38.5%; normal CSF parameters). Six variables (age, serum TRUST titer, CSF protein, CSF nucleated cells, IgG index, CSF TTs) were used for model construction. The XGBoost model demonstrated optimal performance, achieving an AUC of 0.966 (accuracy: 87.3%) on the internal test set and 0.970 (accuracy: 91.5%) on the external validation set. Key predictors included CSF nucleated cells, CSF TTs, and IgG index. Conclusion: This study defines three clinically meaningful latent subtypes of neurosyphilis. The developed XGBoost model effectively discriminates between these subtypes of neurosyphilis and non-neurosyphilis in clinical settings, facilitating timely diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.