ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Effect of general anesthesia vs. local anesthesia and collateral status on outcomes in anterior circulation occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The impact of anesthesia type on outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains controversial. Collateral status assessed through perfusion imaging may provide critical insights for optimizing anesthesia strategies during EVT. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, functional outcomes after EVT (measured by the modified Rankin Scale score) were compared between general anesthesia (GA) vs. local anesthesia (LA) using a propensity score-matched model. The association between the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR, defined as Tmax > 10s/Tmax > 6 s) and outcomes was evaluated through weighted multivariate logistic regression, with potential non-linearity explored using restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression. To validate the findings, five analytical approaches were applied, including propensity score matching, multivariate logistic modeling adjusted for all covariates, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and doubly robust estimations with and without adjustments for unbalanced covariates. Results: A total of 702 patients were included, with 327 (46.6%) receiving GA and 375 (53.4%) receiving LA. Propensity score matching achieved balanced baseline characteristics ( Conclusions: There is an association between general anesthesia and poorer functional prognosis in patients with well-developed collateral circulation after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). HIR may serve as a useful marker for anesthesia selection and triage in EVT. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that use of GA is associated with worse functional outcome in patients with good collateral that undergoing EVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.