SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Comparison of acupuncture intervention from the acute phase or the non-acute phase in patients with peripheral facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Warm acupuncture combined with precise meridian sinew needling for refractory peripheral facial paralysis: a propensity score-matched retrospective study on clinical efficacy and infrared thermal imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Does acute-phase acupuncture at Hegu (LI04) promote facial nerve regeneration and upregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway? A hypothesis-generating study in a rabbit crush injury model.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal timing of acupuncture intervention in peripheral facial paralysis (PFP) remains uncertain. This study compared the effectiveness of acupuncture administered during the acute versus non-acute phases of PFP. Methods: A systematic search of eight databases was conducted for relevant literature published from inception until July 1, 2025. This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the predetermined inclusion criteria. The evaluated outcomes encompassed the clinical effective rate, House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading Scale (H-B scale), Facial Disability Index (FDI), cure time, Portmann Simple Score Scale (Portmann score), and non-cure rate at 1-month follow-up. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. This study utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE framework to assess methodological quality and evidence certainty, respectively. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0, with results expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: This meta-analysis included 15 randomized controlled trials involving 771 patients, with the majority demonstrating an unclear or low risk of bias. Pooled results indicated that acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy significantly improved the clinical effective rate (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.06, 1.16], Conclusion: This synthesis provides preliminary evidence that integrating acupuncture with Western medicine during the acute phase of PFP may enhance clinical response rates and accelerate facial functional recovery. However, these conclusions are tempered by methodological limitations observed in the included trials, particularly concerning potential biases and small sample sizes. Consequently, these findings highlight the imperative for more rigorously designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials to establish definitive evidence for clinical application. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero, Unique Identifier: CRD420251084963.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.