Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376767›Full record

ArticleSubstance use : research and treatment

Mothers Marketing to Mothers: An Exploration of Cannabis Use and Constructions of Motherhood on Instagram and Blog Posts.

Tanner M Smith, Stella Kraft, Anne Waugh, Kelly D Harding, Andrea Bombak, Natalie D Riediger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use : research and treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tanner M SmithDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9211-578X
Stella KraftRady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Anne WaughDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kelly D HardingCanada FASD Research Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrea BombakDepartment of Sociology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Natalie D RiedigerDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-9446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cannamom culture (CMC), an online movement for acceptance of cannabis use among mothers, has gained traction on social media. The urgency for exploration of CMC in a Canadian context was enhanced through legalization of cannabis in 2018, followed by legalization of cannabis edibles in 2019. Objectives: We sought to explore cannamoms' social media and blog posts, and their representations of cannabis use and motherhood. Methods: This qualitative study utilized reflexive thematic analysis of Canadian cannamom blog posts (N = 30) and Instagram posts (N = 34). Analysis of these outlets was considered through the lenses of similar social media phenomena, such as influencer, wine mom, wellness, and mental health cultural movements. Results: The overarching theme identified was Conclusions: CMC spaces online reproduce intensive motherhood narratives and position cannabis as an acceptable solution to motherhood struggles. The focus on wellness and personalization draws on wellness movements by constructing cannabis consumption as natural, responsible, and health promoting. These findings have implications for policy makers and healthcare providers regarding mothers' understandings of cannabis use and health.

Indexed as

cannabismotherssocial mediasocial movement spilloverstigmathematic analysiswine mom culture

Identifiers

PMID41376767
PMCPMC12686357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.