Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376715›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025

Spontaneous regression rate of high-grade cervical lesions in women under 35 at Dijon University Hospital: Incidence and predictive factors.

Tronche Perrine, Bouit Camille, Aho Serge, Douvier Serge, Kadhel Philippe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tronche PerrineDijon University Hospital, Gynecology et Obstetrics Department, Biostatistics; Pathology Department, France.
Bouit CamilleDijon University Hospital, Gynecology et Obstetrics Department, Biostatistics; Pathology Department, France.
Aho SergeDijon University Hospital, Gynecology et Obstetrics Department, Biostatistics; Pathology Department, France.
Douvier SergeDijon University Hospital, Gynecology et Obstetrics Department, Biostatistics; Pathology Department, France.
Kadhel PhilippeDijon University Hospital, Gynecology et Obstetrics Department, Biostatistics; Pathology Department, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: According to current guidelines, women with CIN 2/3 should undergo a conization procedure. However, for young patients with small lesions, it is possible to consider therapeutic abstention with close monitoring while awaiting potential spontaneous regression. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the regression rate of CIN 2/3 lesions over 24 months of follow-up in women under the age of 35 and to identify predictive factors for spontaneous healing. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study based on data from patients diagnosed with CIN 2 or CIN 3 who underwent close monitoring every 6 months via colposcopy, for a maximum follow-up period of 24 months between May 2008 and May 2024. The primary endpoint was the rate of spontaneous regression of high-grade lesions. Results: 104 patients, with a mean age of 27.8 years, were included. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia spontaneously regressed in 37 patients (35.6 %, Conclusion: The results of the study are consistent with the literature and support the possibility of 24-month surveillance of patients with a high-grade lesion, especially given the low risk of progression to more severe disease within two years.

Indexed as

Cervical CancerCervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaClose MonitoringColposcopyConservative ManagementHuman Papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID41376715
PMCPMC12686737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.