ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025
Spontaneous regression rate of high-grade cervical lesions in women under 35 at Dijon University Hospital: Incidence and predictive factors.
Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regression of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in women aged 30 years or younger: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Association Between HPV Vaccination and Cervical Dysplasia Severity in HPV-Positive Women.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Regression, Persistence, and Progression of Cervical Precursor Lesions in Relation to High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes Over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Prospective Cohort Study in Iran.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: According to current guidelines, women with CIN 2/3 should undergo a conization procedure. However, for young patients with small lesions, it is possible to consider therapeutic abstention with close monitoring while awaiting potential spontaneous regression. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the regression rate of CIN 2/3 lesions over 24 months of follow-up in women under the age of 35 and to identify predictive factors for spontaneous healing. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study based on data from patients diagnosed with CIN 2 or CIN 3 who underwent close monitoring every 6 months via colposcopy, for a maximum follow-up period of 24 months between May 2008 and May 2024. The primary endpoint was the rate of spontaneous regression of high-grade lesions. Results: 104 patients, with a mean age of 27.8 years, were included. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia spontaneously regressed in 37 patients (35.6 %, Conclusion: The results of the study are consistent with the literature and support the possibility of 24-month surveillance of patients with a high-grade lesion, especially given the low risk of progression to more severe disease within two years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.