ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Unsupervised detection of building destruction during war from publicly available radar satellite imagery.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated detection of building destruction in conflict zones is crucial for human rights monitoring, humanitarian response, and academic research. However, existing approaches (i) rely on proprietary satellite imagery, both expensive and of limited availability at wartime, (ii) require labeled training data, usually not available in war-affected regions, or (iii) use optical imagery, regularly obstructed by cloud cover. This study addresses these challenges by introducing an unsupervised method to detect destruction at the building level using freely and globally available Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar images from the European Space Agency. By statistically assessing interferometric coherence changes over time, unlike existing approaches, our method enables the detection of destruction from a single satellite image, allowing for near real-time destruction assessments every 12 days. We provide a continuous, statistically grounded probability measure for the likelihood of destruction at both the building and pixel level, thereby quantifying the level of uncertainty of the detection. Using ground truth data and reported sequences of events, we validate our approach both quantitatively and qualitatively, across three case studies in Beirut, Mariupol, and Gaza, demonstrating its ability to accurately identify the spatial patterns and timing of destruction events. Using open-access data, our method offers a scalable, global, and cost-effective solution for monitoring building destruction in conflict zones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.