Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

A cross-domain framework for emotion and stress detection using WESAD, SCIENTISST-MOVE, and DREAMER datasets.

Ahmad Almadhor, Stephen Ojo, Thomas I Nathaniel, Kingsley Ukpong, Shtwai Alsubai, Abdullah Al Hejaili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmad AlmadhorDepartment of Computer Engineering and Networks, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Stephen OjoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Anderson University, Anderson, SC, United States.
Thomas I NathanielSchool of Medicine Greenville, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Kingsley UkpongDepartment of Electrical Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Oye Ekiti, Nigeria.
Shtwai AlsubaiCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Al HejailiFaculty of Computers and Information Technology, Information Technology Department, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Emotional and stress-related disorders pose a growing threat to global mental health, emphasizing the critical need for accurate, robust, and interpretable emotion recognition systems. Despite advances in affective computing, existing models often lack generalizability across diverse physiological and behavioral datasets, limiting their practical deployment. Methods: This study presents a dual deep learning-based framework for mental health monitoring and activity monitoring. The first approach introduces a framework for stress classification based on a 1D-CNN trained on the WESAD dataset. This model is then fine-tuned using the ScientISST-MOVE dataset to detect daily life activities based on motion signals, and it is used as transfer learning for a downstream task. An explainable AI technique is used to interpret the model's predictions, while class imbalance is addressed using focal loss and class weighting. The second approach employs a temporal conformer architecture combining CNN and transformer components to model temporal dependencies in continuous affective ratings of emotional states based on valence, arousal, and dominance (VAD) using the DREAMER dataset. This method incorporates feature engineering techniques and models temporal dependencies in ECG signals. Results: The deep learning classifier trained on WESAD biosignal data achieved 98% accuracy across three classes, demonstrating highly reliable stress classification. The transfer learning model, evaluated on the ScientISST-MOVE dataset, achieved an overall accuracy of 82% across four activity states, with good precision and recall for high-support classes. However, the explanations produced by Grad-CAM appear uninformative and do not clearly indicate which parts of the signals influence the prediction. The conformer model achieved an R Discussion: The framework demonstrates strong performance, interpretability, and real-time applicability in personalized affective computing.

Indexed as

biosignal classificationdeep learningemotion recognitionexplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)mental health monitoringphysiological signalsstress detectiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41376700
PMCPMC12685819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.