ArticleJPRAS open2026
Development and impact of virtual reality-based training for the radial forearm free flap: A multi-center prospective feasibility study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metaverse-Based Virtual Reality for Remote Anatomy Education: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical education faces growing challenges due to reduced theatre access, variable supervision and limited procedural exposure, particularly for complex reconstructive operations such as the radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Virtual reality (VR) offers an opportunity to deliver immersive, standardized surgical training unconstrained by geography or theatre availability. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a VR-based teaching intervention in improving procedural confidence and anatomical understanding of the RFFF. Methods: A prospective multicenter feasibility study was conducted across 10 UK medical schools and one NHS trust. Participants completed a 60-minute workshop including a 360° VR simulation of the RFFF procedure and a VR anatomical exploration session. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed procedural confidence, anatomical understanding and user experience using validated Likert-scale tools. Results: 141 participants completed both pre- and post-workshop assessments. The majority were undergraduate medical students (90.8 %), of whom 93.8 % had never previously observed an RFFF. Procedural confidence improved significantly from a median of 2 (IQR 2) to 4 (IQR 1) post-workshop ( Conclusion: The VRiMS RFFF teaching module significantly improves learner confidence and anatomical understanding, particularly among early-stage trainees. These findings support the use of VR-based platforms as effective and scalable adjuncts to existing surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.