ArticleInternational journal of artificial intelligence in education2025
Speech Enabled Reading Fluency Assessment: a Validation Study.
Article in International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the ability to comprehend what one is reading is one of the most fundamental necessities to function within society, the reading comprehension skills of students have recently been on the decline in many countries. An essential prerequisite to reading comprehension is the ability to read fluently, which is defined as the ability to read (aloud) with accuracy, speed, automaticity and prosody. Current oral reading fluency assessment instruments seldom provide detailed diagnostics however, and bestow a heavy testing burden on practitioners. Recent developments in Artificial Intelligence-based assessment methodology might provide a solution to current assessment issues, but thorough validations of such procedures have proven scarce. This study evaluates whether valid word decoding and passage reading measures (accuracy, speed and automaticity) can be generated for a semi-transparent language, using an automatic speech recognition (ASR) based oral reading fluency assessment instrument. A validation study was conducted, using the Argument-Based Approach to Validation. Data concerned 176 h of speech data, and the results of 569 and 622 oral word- and passage reading tests that are currently administered in primary schools, from 653 children attending the second- or third grade of Dutch primary education. The results of the validation indicate that it is possible to generate fluency metrics for a semi-transparent language, using an ASR-based oral reading fluency assessment instrument. Future researchers are advised to further optimize the ASR, evaluate its errors, and realize a prosody component, completing the envisioned reading fluency assessment instrument, thereby improving reading fluency assessment throughout primary education. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.