ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Management of Permanent Filler Complications Using Deep-Plane Facelift and Temporoparietal Fascial Flap Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Permanent fillers can lead to long-term complications, including granulomas, infections, and migration. Their removal often causes significant facial defects, posing challenges in reconstructive surgery. Objectives: The authors of this study aim to evaluate the clinical outcomes of deep-plane facelifts combined with temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF) reconstruction in managing complications and restoring aesthetics following permanent filler removal. Methods: This retrospective study included 160 patients who underwent deep-plane facelifts with permanent filler removal and TPFF reconstruction between 2014 and 2022. Those with unrealistic expectations, BMI >30, a recent infection (≤3 months), or severe malar edema were excluded. The average follow-up period was 16 months (range, 6-68 months). Results: Of 160 patients (149 females, 11 males; mean age 48 ± 8.4 years), 131 (82%) completed follow-up. The complication rate was 22%, including transient swelling and bruising (15%), minor infections (4%), and hematomas (3%). Psychological outcomes improved significantly, with increased self-esteem and social interaction scores and reduced anxiety and depression levels. Hospital stays averaged 32 h (range, 24-48 h). Conclusions: TPFF reconstruction during deep-plane facelifts is a reliable approach for addressing complications and defects following permanent filler removal. This technique provides reliable reconstruction and improved outcomes, with promising long-term stability. Further research is warranted to refine these methods and optimize patient care. Level of Evidence 4 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.