White Matter Bundle Reconstruction From Single-Shell Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Test-Retest Reliability and Predictive Capability Across Orientation Distribution Function Reconstruction Methods.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Amelie RaulandInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-2073
Steven L MeislerThe Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8888-1572
Aaron F Alexander-BlochLifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-1893
Joëlle BagautdinovaThe Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-467X
Erica B BallerThe Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7987-3773
Raquel E GurLifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-8502
Ruben C GurLifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9657-1996
Audrey C LuoThe Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6798-1876
Tyler M MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-0151
Oleksandr V PopovychInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-1764
Kathrin ReetzSection for Translational Neurodegeneration, Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9730-9228
David R RoalfLifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1728-9782
Russell T ShinoharaPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8627-8203
Susan SotardiDivision of Neuroradiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8389-2419
Valerie J SydnorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8640-668X
Arastoo VossoughDivision of Neuroradiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-427X
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-2759
Matthew CieslakThe Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1931-4734
Theodore D SatterthwaiteThe Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-9399
Funding
Statistical Methods for Multilevel Multivariate Functional StudiesR01NS060910 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ciprian M Crainiceanu · 2009 to 2026
$8.3M
Longitudinal Mapping of Network Development Underlying Executive Dysfunction in AdolescenceR01MH113550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Danielle Smith Bassett, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Training for Transformative Discovery in PsychiatryT32MH016804 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SWEET, ROBERT A · 1985 to 2025
$6.2M
SCHIZOPHRENIA: A NEUROPSYCHIATRIC PERSPECTIVET32MH019112 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 1990 to 2024
$6.2M
Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
The Genetics of Personalized Functional MRI NetworksR01MH132934 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Aaron Felix Alexander-Bloch · 2023 to 2026
$4.2M
Harmonization of Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data from Complex Study DesignsR01MH123550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2020 to 2025
$4.0M
Ultra-high field GluCEST MRI and MRS in youth at risk for psychosisR01MH120174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROALF, DAVID R · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Evolution of Psychosis in Youth: Multimodal Risk and Resilience MarkersR01MH119219 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E, GUR, RUBEN C. · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Reproducible imaging-based brain growth charts for psychiatryR01MH120482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Precision brain charts for imaging-genomics of schizophrenia and the psychosis spectrumR01MH133843 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Aaron Felix Alexander-Bloch · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Creating an adaptive screening tool for detecting neurocognitive deficits and psychopathology across the lifespanR01MH117014 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RUBEN C. · 2019 to 2022
Deriving white matter (WM) bundles in vivo has thus far mainly been applied in research settings, leveraging high angular resolution, multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions that enable modern reconstruction methods. However, these advanced acquisitions are both time-consuming and costly to acquire. The ability to reconstruct WM bundles in the massive amounts of existing single-shelled, lower angular resolution data from legacy research studies and healthcare systems would offer much broader clinical applications and population-level generalizability. While legacy scans may offer a valuable, large-scale complement to contemporary research datasets, the reliability of white matter bundles derived from these scans remains unclear. Here, we leverage a large research dataset where each 64-direction dMRI scan was acquired as two independent 32-direction runs per subject. To investigate how a state-of-the-art bundle-specific reconstruction method generalizes to this data, we evaluated the test-retest reliability of WM bundles reconstructed from the two 32-direction scans across three orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction methods: generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI), constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), and single-shell three-tissue CSD (SS3T). We found that the majority of WM bundles could be reliably extracted from dMRI scans that were acquired using the 32-direction, single-shell acquisition scheme. The mean Dice coefficient of reconstructed WM bundles was consistently higher within subject than between subject for all WM bundles and ODF reconstruction methods, illustrating preservation of person-specific anatomy. Further, when using features of the bundles to predict complex reasoning assessed using a computerized cognitive battery, we observed stable prediction accuracies (r: 0.15-0.36) across the test-retest data. Among the three ODF reconstruction methods, SS3T had a good balance between sensitivity and specificity when comparing the reconstructed bundles to atlas bundles, a high intra-class correlation of extracted features, more plausible bundles, and strong predictive performance. More broadly, these results demonstrate that bundle-specific reconstruction can achieve robust performance even on lower angular resolution, single-shell dMRI, with particular advantages for ODF methods optimized for single-shell data. This highlights the considerable potential for dMRI collected in healthcare settings and legacy research datasets to accelerate and expand the scope of WM research.
Indexed as
BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultbundlescognitiondiffusion MRIreliabilitytest–retestwhite matter
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
White Matter Bundle Reconstruction From Single-Shell Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Test-Retest Reliability and Predictive Capability Across Orientation Distribution Function Reconstruction Methods. · full record | OpenQuestion