ReviewStroke2026
Acute Treatment of Disabling and Nondisabling Minor Ischemic Stroke: Expert Guidance for Clinicians.
Review in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minor ischemic strokes, usually defined as acute ischemic strokes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5, account for over half of all cases and are often underestimated due to initially mild symptoms. Yet up to 30% of patients develop disability within 90 days, challenging the notion of a benign course. This guidance offers a pragmatic, scenario-based framework for acute minor ischemic stroke management, considering symptom severity (disabling versus nondisabling), eligibility for reperfusion, and presence of large vessel occlusion. Drawing from randomized trials, real-world evidence, and international guidelines, we examine therapeutic strategies, including dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, anticoagulation, intravenous thrombolysis, and endovascular treatment. Intravenous thrombolysis is preferred for disabling symptoms within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, whereas dual antiplatelet therapy remains standard for noncardioembolic, nondisabling events. For cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke ineligible for reperfusion, early anticoagulation within 48 hours appears safe and beneficial. Evidence for routine endovascular treatment in minor ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion remains limited and controversial. We also address management of rapidly improving yet disabling symptoms and postreperfusion antithrombotic strategies, emphasizing individualized care and the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.